Posts Tagged ‘ fhfa ’

Why REO Discounts Vary So Greatly: FHFA

Why REO Discounts Vary So Greatly: FHFA

09/18/2012BY: ESTHER CHO

Calculations for REO discounts can differ on extreme levels. In a mortgage market note from FHFA, the agency explained the common reasons behind the variations.

The note stated that REO discounts heard in media reports “are typically found by comparing sales prices of REOproperties to prior valuations of the same houses or sales prices of non-foreclosed houses and are generally larger than the discount caused solely by REO status.”

RealtyTrac, which is cited in news reports often, foundREO discounts from 2010 to 2012 ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent, according to the note.

The estimates found in the news media are in accord with consumer expectations as well. FHFA pointed to a Harris Interactive survey conducted in April 2011 for an ongoing RealtyTrac and Trulia study, which found American adults expected to pay 38 percent less for a foreclosed house than a similar non-foreclosure.

The academic world, which tends to depend on location, time and controls for estimates, has a discount range that can be anywhere between zero to 50, but most estimates on REO discounts in academic literature fall in the 10 to 25 percent range when looking at nationwide averages, according to the note.

When observing estimates for just one metropolitan statistical area, the variability is even greater since the academic studies adjust for characteristics and property condition.

FHFA stated there are at least six reasons to explain whyREO discounts vary so greatly. The first three are the condition effect, characteristics effect, and market effect. Those explanations are directly related to the property value of houses. The last three explanations are: buyer-related effect such as risk aversion, seller motivation effect such as loss aversion, and stigma effect. These are whatFHFA called indirect mechanisms.

The condition effect can affect an REO discount since REOs, unlike non-foreclosures, are more likely to remain unrepaired if damaged, such as from inclement weather. Also, some REOs would find a loss in value because of intentional damage left from a previous owner.

The note also stated that REO discounts reported in the news typically don’t account for differences in property characteristics such as age and size when comparing REOproperties to non-foreclosures. According to the note, REOs actually tend to be older and have smaller lots than non-foreclosed houses.

The note explained that REO discounts found in media reports also usually compare REOs to prior sales prices or previous assessment values of REO properties or values of non-forecloses from other neighborhoods.

This can have a significant impact on REO discounts, especially during market downturns. For example, during a downturn, a home that sold in 2006 for $100,000 may sell for $80,000 in 2011, even if it’s not an REO. This type of market downturn can inflate the REO discount estimate, the note explained.

The buyer-related effect deals with concerns over risks such as hidden costs, unforeseen delays, and potential loss of property value due to unexpected issues.

Seller motivation can also affect the REO discount. Since servicers have to pay fees such as taxes, insurance fees, and maintenance costs, they have an incentive to maximize the sales price.

In addition, the stigma of REO properties has an impact on the discount.

Olick – will Q3 juice housing?

Olick – will Q3 juice housing?

“Home prices are stabilizing, and new construction is bouncing back, but apparently the US Federal Reserve isn’t buying a bullish housing recovery. Its announcement Thursday that it would buy up to $40 billion in agency mortgage-backed securities every month, with no clear finish line, says loud and clear that the Fed thinks housing needs more stimulus. Mortgage rates are already hovering near record lows, but mortgage applications, especially to purchase a home, have been weak. So many have refinanced already at low rates, and so many more are unable to refinance because of lack of home equity or high fees. As for home buying, the real growth in that area this year has been among investors on the low end, largely using all cash. Supplies of foreclosed properties have been shrinking dramatically, as those investors swarm auctions and bid on bulk deals. The hot and still heating rental market offers potentially more rewards than the volatile stock market. In turn, all that act ivity on the distressed end is pushing up home prices. While overall foreclosure activity is falling, we could see volumes of bank-owned properties for sale rising over the next few months, as banks look to take advantage of rising demand and prices. We are already seeing spikes in foreclosures activity in states where these cases had been backed up in the courts. ‘Bucking the national trend, deferred foreclosure activity boiled over in several states in August,’ said Daren Blomquist, vice president of RealtyTrac. ‘In judicial states such as Florida, Illinois, New Jersey and New York, this was a continuation of a trend we’ve been seeing for several months now. The increases in Florida and Illinois pushed foreclosure rates in those states to the two highest in the country — supplanting the non-judicial states of Arizona, California, Georgia and Nevada. Previous to August, the nation’s top two state foreclosure rates have been from those four non-judicial sta tes every month since December 2010.’ As more of these properties come to market, investors will likely prevail, despite many potential owner occupants looking to get in on good deals. Again, this is because investors have the cash advantage. Even low mortgage rates won’t help some potential buyers, because Fannie Mae and Freddie Macare still increasing guarantee fees, which push rates higher. They could, however, mitigate some of the fee hikes. ‘For everyday homeowners, QE3 should work to suppress mortgage rates at a time when they’re artificially increasing. QE3 will offset the majority of the FHFA’s new g-fees, and will help keep FHA loans affordable despite rising mortgage insurance premiums,’ argued Dan Green of Waterstone Mortgage. But there is also plenty of uncertainty about the future of mortgage financing, depending on the outcome of the November election, not to mention action the current administration is taking to shrink Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. ‘One new wrinkle is the recent announcement that Fannie and Freddie will be required to shrink their own retained MBS portfolios faster than expected,’ noted Guy Cecala of Inside Mortgage Finance. ‘This could slightly dilute the impact of the Fed’s action since its increased purchases may be offset by less GSE purchases.’ To see the low interest rates are not the housing cure-all, one need look no further than weekly mortgage applications numbers, which have been lackluster of late to say the least. The one benefit could be in the refinance segment of the market, especially as there is a new push to broaden the administration’s current refinance program for underwater borrowers. More refinances mean more money in consumers’ pockets. Unfortunately the Democrat-led effort is unlikely to make its way into reality, given the rising Republican opposition as election day nears. No question more and more Americans will be turning to the housing market this fall, as home ownership is now cheaper than renting in all of the 100 largest US markets, ‘by a wide margin,’ according to a new report from Trulia.com. What remains to be seen is how many potential buyers will be able to take advantage of these low rates, given the still tight lending standards that rule today’s market.

First Winning Bidder Announced for FHFA’s REO Bulk Sale

First Winning Bidder Announced for FHFA’s REO Bulk Sale

09/10/2012BY: ESTHER CHO

After much anticipation, FHFA announced the first winning bidder for its REO bulk sale.

San Diego-based-“Pacifica Companies”:http://pacificacompanies.com/, LLC, purchased 699 Fannie Mae properties in Florida through the REO pilot initiative.

Out of the 699 properties, 506 were occupied units. According to the transaction details, the estimated value of the transaction to Fannie Mae is $78.1 million or 95.8 percent of the third party value ($81.5 million).

In a release, the agency stated it will announce the winning investors for properties in other areas in the coming weeks when the transactions close.

In Atlanta, 541 properties were not awarded. Instead,FHFA stated the properties will be evaluated for disposition through Fannie Mae’s retail sales or through future structured transactions.

FHFA also stated all properties were sold near or above market value.

Through the pilot, nearly 2,500 Fannie Mae REOs were slated for sale in areas including Las Vegas, Nevada; Phoenix, Arizona; Chicago, Illinois; and Riverside and Los Angeles, California.

GSEs to Raise G-Fees by Average of 10 Basis Points

GSEs to Raise G-Fees by Average of 10 Basis Points

08/31/2012BY: ESTHER CHO

Before the end of this year, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will raise guarantee fees (g-fees) on single-family mortgages by an average of 10 basis points.

When the GSEs provide mortgage-backed securities (MBS), they guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the securities and charge a g-fee for the guarantee. The fee is used to cover potential credit losses in case a borrower defaults and for administrative costs.

On Friday, FHFA, the GSEs’ conservator, announced it has directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase g-fees as a step toward encouraging more mortgage market participation from private firms.

“These changes will move Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pricing closer to the level one might expect to see if mortgage credit risk was borne solely by private capital,” said Edward J. DeMarco, Acting Director of FHFA, stated in a release.

The increase are scheduled to take effect on December 1 for loans exchanged for mortgage-backed securities and for loans sold for cash, the increases are scheduled for November 1, 2012.

In addition to making the announcement, FHFA released areport on single-family g-fees for 2010 and 2011, which found the GSEs, on average, increased g-fees by 26 basis points in 2010 and 28 basis points in 2011.

FHFA also noted the report revealed higher risk mortgages were generally subsidized by lower-risk loans, and most single-family mortgages bought by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac came from a concentrated group of large lenders. According to the report, in 2010 and 2011, the top five lenders accounted for around 60 percent of the GSEs combined business volume compared to under 10 percent for lenders ranked below the top 100.

FHFA stated the issue will be addressed by having the g-fees charged to lenders who deliver large volumes of loans more “uniform” compared to those who deliver small volumes.

Cross-subsidies will be addressed by increasing g-fees on loans that take more than 15 years to mature. According to the report, 15-year fixed-rate loans have a history of lower credit losses.

Short Sales Get a Boost

Short Sales Get a Boost

Homeowners could soon have an easier time selling their homes for less than what they owe on their mortgages, under new guidelines from a federal housing regulator and mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Federal Housing Finance Agency on Tuesday announced measures to make “short sales” of underwater homes easier for homeowners, including extending help to people who have financial difficulties but haven’t missed mortgage payments. One part of the plan is for Fannie and Freddie to place a $6,000 cap on the amount of money holders of second mortgages can receive when the sale is completed, as a way to prevent the mortgage holders from haggling over their slice of the home-sale proceeds. Those second-lien holders would still be able to reject the sales if they saw fit. The changes only affect underwater mortgages guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie, which back the bulk of US home loans. The FHFA has the authority, as regulator for Fannie and Freddie, to force changes on the lending industry. The housing regulator didn’t estimate how many people would now qualify for short sales, but about 4.6 million borrowers with loans backed by Fannie or Freddie are underwater, with 80% of those homeowners having missed no mortgage payments. The rules go into effect Nov. 1 and also allow homeowners with missed mortgage payments and serious financial problems to submit fewer documents to be approved for a short sale. Homeowners will receive speedier approval if they are experiencing a financial hardship such as a lost job, divorce, death in the family or job relocation. Earlier this year, the housing regulator set out formal timelines for short sales, saying that mortgage lenders would have to respond to a short-sale offer within 30 days of receiving it. Short sales have been growing as a percentage of home sales. They made up 8.8% of home sales in May, up from 7.6% a year earlier and 6.5% in 2010, according to CoreLogic Inc.

FHFA: Q2 Price Growth Largest Since 2005, Distressed Sales Drop

FHFA: Q2 Price Growth Largest Since 2005, Distressed Sales Drop

08/23/2012BY: TORY BARRINGER

 

This year’s second quarter saw the largest quarterly growth in home prices in nearly seven years, according to FHFA’s purchase-only home price index (HPI).

The agency issued a report Thursday showing that house prices rose 1.8 percent from the year’s first quarter to the second quarter-the largest growth since the fourth quarter of 2005-and 3.0 percent year-over-year. Adjusted for inflation, the HPI rose approximately 1.3 percent over the latest year.

The latest quarter also marks the first time since 2007 that a second quarter posted year-over-year gains.

FHFA’s expanded-data HPI (which adds transactions information from county recorder offices and FHA) rose 2.0 percent over Q2, bringing the index up 2.4 percent over the latest four quarters.

The seasonally adjusted purchase-only HPI rose in 43 states in the second quarter. The Census’ “Mountain” region saw the most growth (posting an average 6.99 percent year-over-year increase), while “Middle Atlantic” and “New England” posted average price decreases (0.61 percent and 1.29 percent, respectively).

“Although some housing markets are still facing significant challenges, house prices were quite strong in most areas in the second quarter,” said Andrew Leventis, principal economist for FHFA. “The strong appreciation may partially reflect fewer homes sold in distress, but declining mortgage rates and a modest supply of homes available for sale likely account for most of the price increase.”

A data sample of 12 metro areas across the country showed that the share of distressed sales in the market fell to 29.1 percent, a sharp drop from the first quarter’s 38.3 percent share.

Metros with highest appreciation (year-over-year)

  • Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, Arizona (5.98 percent)
  • Boise City-Nampa, Idaho (5.88 percent)
  • Columbus, Indiana (5.05 percent)
  • Bismarck, North Dakota (5.02 percent)
  • Huntington-Ashland, West Virginia-Kentucky-Ohio (4.46 percent)

Metros with highest depreciation (year-over-year)

  • Port St. Lucie, Florida (7.46 percent)
  • Tacoma, Washington (6.44 percent)
  • Kankakee-Bradley, Illinois (5.70 percent)
  • Tallahassee, Florida (5.55 percent)
  • Chico, California (5.52 percent)

Treasury Announces Plans to Wind Down Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

Treasury Announces Plans to Wind Down Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

08/17/2012BY: TORY BARRINGER

Treasury announced Friday a set of modifications to Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements (PSPAs) between itself and FHFA designed to help speed up the wind down ofFannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

In addition to reducing the GSEs’ mortgage portfolios in a more timely manner, these modifications are designed to ensure that each firm’s earnings benefit taxpayers and help reform the housing finance market.

The modifications include a few key components, such as an annual plan to reduce taxpayer exposure to mortgage credit risk and a full income sweep of all of the GSEs’ future earnings to benefit taxpayers for their investment, replacing the 10 percent dividend payments made to Treasury on its preferred stock investment with a quarterly sweep of all profits each firm earns going forward.

In addition, the agreements require an accelerated reduction of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s investment portfolios. The GSEs’ investment portfolios must be reduced to the $250 billion target set in previous agreements four years earlier than previously scheduled.

The modified PSPAs are consistent with FHFA’s strategic plan for the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac released in February.

“With today’s announcement, we are taking the next step toward responsibly winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac while continuing to support the necessary process of repair and recovery in the housing market,” said Michael Stegman, counselor to the secretary of the Treasury for housing finance policy.

Treasury said it hopes to use these modifications to prevent the market from returning to its previous form and to end the “circular practice of the Treasury advancing funds to the GSEs simply to pay dividends back to Treasury.”

“As we continue to work toward bi-partisan housing finance reform, we are committed to putting in place measures right now that support continued access to mortgage credit for American families, promote a responsible transition, and protect taxpayer interests,” Stegman said.

In a statement released by FHFA, acting director Edward DeMarco said the PSPA modifications will help build a future for the operations of the GSEs.

“These changes provide certainty to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and market participants as they continue to perform their critical mission of providing liquidity and stability to the country’s housing market. The steps today are also important as Congress and policymakers contemplate the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,” DeMarco said.

Olick – Fannie’s new CEO

Olick – Fannie’s new CEO

“Fannie Mae is no longer bleeding cash, at least for now. After devastating losses since 2008, the mortgage giant reported its second straight quarter of positive net income, even after making a $2.9 billion dividend payment to the U.S. Treasury. Fannie Mae has taken $117.1 billion from the Treasury since the fall of 2008. Improving home prices and decreasing mortgage delinquencies have helped to boost the bottom line, but Fannie Mae’s CEO Tim Mayopoulos, who took the reigns of the company earlier this summer, says he’s not convinced housing is out of the woods yet. ‘I think it’s too early to declare a national housing recovery,’ Mayopoulos said in an interview Wednesday on CNBC. ‘What’s driving our results has been home price improvements. We are not expecting to see huge improvements going forward.’ Fannie Mae reported net income of $5.1 billion in the second quarter of this year, up from $2.7 billion in th e first quarter. Foreclosures, however, still weigh heavily on the balance sheet, despite the far higher quality of loans in the new book of business since 2009. 59 percent of Fannie Mae’s single-family guaranty book of business as of the end of the second quarter consisted of loans it had purchased or guaranteed since the beginning of 2009. Expectations of an improving housing market prompted Fannie Mae to reduce its future loan loss reserves to $68 billion from nearly $77 billion in the first quarter. The company notes in its report that it believes credit-related expenses will be lower in 2012 than in 2011. Mayopoulos, again, seems to hedge that somewhat. ‘We are very excited about the new book of business we’ve been writing since the beginning of the crisis. We believe that we could be profitably going forward but it doesn’t mean we will necessarily make enough every quarter to be able to cover the entire dividend payment to the Treasury,’ said Mayopoulos, who added that he is very comfortable with where Fannie Mae’s underwriting standards are now, despite criticism from housing industry players who claim credit is too tight. Mayopoulos expects home prices to bounce around more before finding a solid bottom, and that will in turn keep millions of borrowers, around 11 million by several recent accounts, in a negative equity position, owing more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth. The Obama administration has been pushing hard for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to participate in the government’s program that pays lenders to reduce balances on troubled loans. Last week, however, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s conservator, FHFA director Edward DeMarco, said the mortgage giants would not participate in that program. ‘We are comfortable with where Director Demarco came out. We believe that we have the tools here at Fannie Mae to really help homeowners in terms of doing modifications and to help people who are in distress,’ Mayopoul os said. Fannie Mae completed 35,332 loan modifications in the second quarter, down from 46,671 in the previous quarter. It also approved just over 24,000 short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure, up from just over 22,000 in the previous quarter. Refinances were far higher, with Fannie Mae acquiring 247,000 of those loans in the quarter. Fannie Mae still has over 109,000 foreclosed properties on its books, despite selling more of them than they took in during the quarter. Its foreclosure rate is falling as are its loan delinquencies, but the legacy losses are still quite large. Fannie Mae has been experimenting with bulk sales of foreclosures as well as bad loans to investors. As for the future of the mortgage giant, which along with Freddie Mac and FHA accounts for around 90 percent of all new mortgage originations, Mayopoulos said he would leave that to policy makers. Until then, he is somewhat hopeful that Fannie Mae will continue on its own path to recovery. ‘We do t hink over the long term Fannie Mae can have strong profitability and can return a considerable amount of value to taxpayers, but over the next few quarters I think it’s going to really depend on housing prices and other factors.'”

FHFA Expresses ‘Significant’ Concern Over Eminent Domain Proposal

FHFA Expresses ‘Significant’ Concern Over Eminent Domain Proposal

08/08/2012BY: ESTHER CHO

FHFA issued a notice Wednesday to warn of the controversial use of eminent domain recently proposed in San Bernardino County.

In San Bernardino County, officials are considering the use of eminent domain to seize underwater mortgages. The mortgages would be taken at fair market value, and then restructured into new loans with terms reflecting the current market. Chicago and Berkeley are also exploring the proposed use of eminent domain.

In the notice, which was sent to the Federal Register, FHFAstated it had “significant concerns about the use of eminent domain to revise existing financial contracts and the alteration of the value of Enterprise or Bank securities holdings.”

FHFA said that in relation to the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the use of an eminent domain program could result in a cost to taxpayers.

FHFA also stated it had significant concerns regarding a “chilling effect on the extension of credit to borrowers seeking to become homeowners and on investors that support the
housing market.”

As conservator for the GSEs and as a regulator for Federal Home Loan Banks, FHFA stated it may need to take action “to avoid a risk to safe and sound operations and to avoid taxpayer expense.”

Along with concerns, the agency also raised several questions, including the constitutionality of the proposed use of eminent domain; the effects on holders of existing securities; and the impact on millions of negotiated and performing mortgage contracts.

FHFA said it is accepting input on topic through its Office of General Counsel (OGC) no later than September 7, 2012.

Views on the topic may be emailed to eminentdomainOGC@fhfa.gov or sent to FHFA OGC, 400 Seventh Street SW., Eighth Floor, Washington, D.C. 20024. Input may be made public.

Officials Launch Educational Efforts for $25B Settlement, Warn of Scams

Officials Launch Educational Efforts for $25B Settlement, Warn of Scams

08/02/2012BY: ESTHER CHO

Servicers have three years to provide relief to homeowners as outlined in the $25 billion national mortgage settlement. To raise awareness and alert homeowners of the help that is available, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan and Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller announced a new settlement PSA and online resourcesthrough the HUD website.

The online resources through HUD include fact sheets and links to additional resources.

As programs offering assistance are announced, Miller warned of scam artists and said that if someone asks for money upfront for assistance, don’t do it.

“You don’t have to pay a dime to participate in this. There are real criminals trying to take advantage of people,” said Miller.

One way to access free assistance is by contacting a HUDcounselor at  888-995-HOPE.

Through the $25 billion mortgage servicing settlement, $10 billion is available for principal reductions to provide relief to underwater homeowners. Also, at least $3 billion is available for refinancing underwater borrowers who are current on their mortgage.

The five servicers participating in the settlement are Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and Ally Financial. If servicers don’t meet the targeted amounts of relief they are required to offer within three years, they will face financial penalties.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans are not eligible for principal reduction through the settlement due to a decision from the GSEs’ regulator, Edward DeMarco.

FHFA Acting Director DeMarco recently reiterated his decision against principal reduction for GSE loans, citing reasons such as taxpayer losses and a moral hazard issue.

Both Donovan and Miller said they believe DeMarco’s decision is wrong.

“I believe, the president believes, the treasury secretary believes, the decision that Ed DeMarco made is wrong. We’ve urged him to reconsider,” said Donovan. “There is clear evidence at this point that principal reductions benefit not only homeowners and neighborhoods, but would benefit the taxpayer in this case, as well the economy more broadly.”

Donovan also added that DeMarco is a career employee, and said that while some have called for him to be fired, that is not authority the president has.

“I just believe so strongly that Ed DeMarco is wrong,” added Miller “In the farm crises of the 1980s in Iowa, principal reduction was done and helped save the rural fabric of our state.”

Separate from the national mortgage settlement, the Fed and OCC announced a deadline extension to request anIndependent Foreclosure Review. The new deadline is December 31, 2012.